GAP WEDGE
The income disparity between an LPGA and a PGA Tour professional is a solvable problem with a little help.
By Stacy LewisGOLF IS A NUMBER GAME, PLAIN AND SIMPLE. The ball doesn’t know if you’re six-foot-six, 240 pounds or, like me, just 5-5, 132. Take the fewest strokes and you win—period. So, some numbers from last year. In 2016, the PGA TOUR leading money winner earned more than $9.3 million, while the LPGA Tour’s top earner pocketed just over $2.5 million. (He won three tournaments; she won five.) I earned $943,502, 16th on my tour—about one-quarter what No. 16 on the PGA Tour did, at $3.7 million. The trend only grows further down the line. No. 100 on the PGA Tour: $1.06 million. No. 100 on the LPGA Tour: a shade over $90,000, or less than 10 percent of her male counterpart. Endorsement deals paint a similar picture.
Is this wage gap due to a talent gap? Well, our most accurate driver hit 86 percent of fairways, or 13 percentage points more than the PGA Tour’s best did. Our leader in Greens in Regulation—approach-shot accuracy, basically—topped the PGA Tour’s leader by 7 percentage points. Our Scoring Average champion averaged 69.58 strokes per round, only about 0.4 more than the PGA Tour’s.
My point isn’t that women could compete successfully on the PGA Tour. It’s that women are playing the same game as men, at an equally high level. We work just as hard on and off the course. Bottom line: PGA Tour and LPGA Tour golfers are world-class athletes playing a sport as well as it’s ever been played, while engaging with their fans. Only women get paid a lot less.
...women are playing the same game as men, at an equally high level
- Stacy Lewis, LPGA Tour Star